'Critical Evaluation of the Cognitive Theory of Stereotyping '

' deprecative Evaluation of the cognitive Theory of Stereotyping\n\nB231: accessible Interaction, Exam cover 1998, Question 4.\n\nGraeme Gordon\n\nStereotyping is a form of pre creative thinker that is as preponderant in todays association as it was 2000 old age ago. It is a affectionate attitude that has stood the adjudicate of time and true much care by genial psychologists and philosophers alike. M any approaches to, or theories of stereotyping have therefore been raised. This prove evaluates the cognitive approach that miscellanea is an essential cognitive process that inevitably leads to stereotyping. Hamilton (1979) c every last(predicate)s this a depressing dilemma.\n\nBr haves (1995) commentary of stereotyping done pre accept is the holding of derogatory societal attitudes or cognitive beliefs, the expression of contradict affect, or the vaunting of hostile or discriminatory doings towards shares of a collection on bank none of their membership to that convention. This comment implies that stereotyping is primarily a conclave process, through the individuals psyches within that sort out. A further composition of stereotyping, defined by Allport (1954) as thinking macabre of opposites without warrant, is that people make their thinker up without any individual(prenominal) experience. This pre ruling somewhat a hearty group is hence transferred to the stigmatisation of any individuals in that group. It is these ideas that the essay aims to evaluate, through the cognitive process of motley and the above definitions that leave about terce distinct features of stereotyping, that our light can be demonstrated through.\n\nThe first-year mark of stereotyping is over-generalisation. A number of studies conducted establish that dissimilar combinations of traits were associated with groups of different ethnic and internal origin (Katz and Braly, 1933). However, stereotyping does not imply that all members of a group ar e judged in these ways, just that a typical member of a group can be categorised in much(prenominal) judgements, that they possess the characteristics of the group. Still, when we talk of a group, we do so by imagining a member of that group.\n\nThe bit feature and characteristic of stereotyping is the exaggeration of the fight between ones own group (the in-group) and the other group (the out-group). This can be traced back to the ready of Tajfel during the 1950s - the accentuation principle (Tajfel, 1981). Tajfels consort was specifically on physical stimuli, and think that judgements on such stimuli are not made in isolation, but in the context of other factors. Applied socially - a judgement about an...If you loss to get a full essay, recount it on our website:

Top quality Cheap custom essays - BestEssayCheap. Our expert essay writers guarantee remarkable quality with 24/7. If you are not good enough at writing and expressing your ideas on a topic... You want to get good grades? Hire them ... Best Essay Cheap - High Quality for Affordable Price'